A reminder in the spirit of being attuned to seemingly far-fetched risks:
If short selling were restricted in any way, the value of puts relative to calls on the same strike increases in a put-call parity framework.
Another way to say this is being long stock is more valuable since only long sellers can sell. If puts increase relative to calls on the same strike, as they do when borrow costs increase, that is like a synthetic future on the stock trading at a discount to the stock price.
Similarly, being short futures vs being long index or SPY expresses the same bet. If futures start trading at a sustained discount to the cash index value it could also reflect an implied probability of short-selling restrictions being imposed.
If futures are trading at full carry and you think such a ban is possible it’s an asymmetric bet to put on conversions (ie short futures, long stock or for options short combos long stock).
Broadly speaking, the derivatives market becomes the underlying market. When the underlying market becomes encumbered do to technical frictions, derivatives are no longer just “derivatives”. The arbitrage mechanism is severed. The derivatives market becomes the home for price discovery.
I’ve seen this happen throughout my career. Just a few examples in addition to hard or impossible to borrow/short situations:
🔗Related
📽️Teaching Options Basics With Live Data (Moontower YouTube)
📔Synthetics: Alternate Realities (Market Jiujitisu)
This week, I hosted class #4 of the Investment Beginnings for local kids aged 12+. The series’…
In this issue: The “three pitches” rule and a lazy man’s framework for getting in…
EWY, the South Korea ETF, was an interesting source of disagreement in our Discord about…
Euan Sinclair needs no introduction from me. I’ll cut straight to the gold. He’s been…
A moontower user sent this [paraphrased] message in our Discord the morning of Jan 9th:…
Remember that chart of CAR last week. (Matt Levine wrote about the fundamentals of the squeeze on…