These are some points I wanted to keepsake from How to Make an Internet Shaquille Video.
The video is exceptional and worth watching. The points I jotted down were for my own reference, you will likely find many other gems in the video.
00:00 Who Cares?
02:24 Biases
05:12 Why Video?
08:28 Common Mistakes
10:14 Get Started
14:32 Script Tips
21:15 Specifics for Formal Education
24:17 Specifics for Youtube
27:53 Technical Tips
A lot of this content is not about how to be successful on YouTube or how to create a popular online course. I believe there’s enough information out there about that, about how to chase the algorithms and such. So, this is more of a Seth Godin head’s perspective, not so much a GaryVee hustle, rise and grind culture type of video. I think that a lot of attention is paid to gaining notoriety, and this is more focused on applying generosity. That’s the word I use the most when I talk about this sort of stuff, and I wish it wasn’t because it sounds like I’m canonizing myself, like I’m this huge saint for making five-minute long YouTube videos. But generosity really is the only way I’ve found to frame this sort of content, like this video that I’m making.
The more generous you can be, the more successful you stand to be as well. I think there’s a direct correlation, if you want there to be.
If you see somebody doing something cool and you say, “Oh, that looks easy. I could do that,” that’s not a very generous interpretation of the cool thing that you saw. However, if you said, “That looks cool. That looks rewarding. I should try that,” I think that’s somebody who’s more likely to produce work in a generous way. And when I say produce work, it’s not about how to make “content”. Content” was always a word for companies like Procter and Gamble to populate their Instagram. You should not aim to make “content”, you should aim to make work that matters for people who care. There’s my first of what will probably be many Seth Godin references. I think that once you start to see your work as a body of work, you’re less likely to write it off as just “content”.
The generous work is anticipating your learner’s actual questions and needs.
Try to be specific about who your learner is. What are their fears? What are their biases? What are their goals?
When you’re in the YouTube space, it’s really tempting to say, “Well, my audience is everybody.” But what ends up happening if you’re trying to reach as many people as possible is that you have to adopt the GaryVee, Mr. Beast aesthetic or mindset. This involves simplifying your information into very basic English to cater to those for whom English isn’t their first language or who can’t read. You’re using vibrant emotions and universal symbols, like showing someone winning money and jumping up and down, or using sound effects like “ding ding ding.” I don’t think these tactics really apply to the style that I hope you’re trying to achieve. So, after you identify your learner, you really do need to identify what it is that they need to learn. This is similar to establishing your learning outcomes.
He doesn’t use the word empathy but this is what an empathetic instructor looks like:
One of the traders in our Discord was discussing exotic options in commodities markets. The…
Friends, My reading habits ebb and flow with my general focus. I read very little…
Friends, Trading firms are Rand-pilled cloisters of libertarianism. Is it a self-serving post-hoc rationalization of…
In the spirit of spaced repetition, I published The Gamma of Levered ETFs as an…
Trading firms are Rand-pilled cloisters of libertarianism. Is it a self-serving post-hoc rationalization of meitrocracy…
Today is about option execution. It’s a blanket response to a host of misunderstandings I…