Prices Are More Than Expectations
This week I came across this tweet by @NewRiverInvest:
Breakevens are not inflation expectations (thread)
It explains how implied breakevens from TIPs are not the same as inflation expectations. One of the reasons is because it’s a small market that is easily distorted.
The second reason is more technical. TIPs are actually implicit options. The face value increases with inflation but is floored at par. So if we experienced deflation you’d get your now-even-more valuable USD back. We should presume the TIPs price reflects not just inflation expectations but a premium for the option value.
This is a familiar lesson. Think about volatility risk premiums. Since convexity improves portfolio CAGRs the expected value of owning an option should actually be negative in arithmetic terms. This is why quants will fancily say “implied vol is a biased estimator of realized vol.” It’s overpriced on average but it’s correlation and convexity attributes suggest it is not overpriced in a repeated, compounding framework.
Another demonstration of “price does not equal expectation” is found in correlation itself. Correlation swaps trade at cheaper levels than implied correlation because being short correlation is a concave (ie negatively convex) position. A correlation seller will require an additional risk premia to be short it. A further explanation can be found in my notes.
So whenever you imply an expectation from a price you need to strip out any additional risk premia or preference that is embedded in the price.
Related:
This ties in well with Why You Don’t Get Paid For Diversifiable Risks (MoontowerMeta)
If you use options to hedge or invest, check out the moontower.ai option trading analytics platform
EWY, the South Korea ETF, was an interesting source of disagreement in our Discord about…
Euan Sinclair needs no introduction from me. I’ll cut straight to the gold. He’s been…
A moontower user sent this [paraphrased] message in our Discord the morning of Jan 9th:…
Remember that chart of CAR last week. (Matt Levine wrote about the fundamentals of the squeeze on…
At least once a day, I think about how the staunchest supporters of “broken window…
From @buccocapital on Anthropic CEO’s insistence that AI is going to wipe out 50% of jobs. Bingo.…
View Comments
true, strictly speaking, but only relevant when breakevens get very low. at current levels the floor options are so far out of the money they are nearly worthless, as demonstrated by the fact that seasoned tips with very far otm floors trade at the same yield as new issues. in addition, inflation swaps trade and have similar liquidity as tips but no floor. interestingly tips breakevens actually trade somewhat cheap to swaps despite the fact that they have a floor.