Prices Are More Than Expectations
This week I came across this tweet by @NewRiverInvest:
Breakevens are not inflation expectations (thread)
It explains how implied breakevens from TIPs are not the same as inflation expectations. One of the reasons is because it’s a small market that is easily distorted.
The second reason is more technical. TIPs are actually implicit options. The face value increases with inflation but is floored at par. So if we experienced deflation you’d get your now-even-more valuable USD back. We should presume the TIPs price reflects not just inflation expectations but a premium for the option value.
This is a familiar lesson. Think about volatility risk premiums. Since convexity improves portfolio CAGRs the expected value of owning an option should actually be negative in arithmetic terms. This is why quants will fancily say “implied vol is a biased estimator of realized vol.” It’s overpriced on average but it’s correlation and convexity attributes suggest it is not overpriced in a repeated, compounding framework.
Another demonstration of “price does not equal expectation” is found in correlation itself. Correlation swaps trade at cheaper levels than implied correlation because being short correlation is a concave (ie negatively convex) position. A correlation seller will require an additional risk premia to be short it. A further explanation can be found in my notes.
So whenever you imply an expectation from a price you need to strip out any additional risk premia or preference that is embedded in the price.
Related:
This ties in well with Why You Don’t Get Paid For Diversifiable Risks (MoontowerMeta)
If you use options to hedge or invest, check out the moontower.ai option trading analytics platform
Kelly Criterion — Cheatsheet Derivation Step 1 One Period Expectancy E = pB − q…
Alex is an options trader you should follow in case he ever tweets a lot.…
In this issue: blindsided “end behavior” Friends, Blindsided My cousin Nicole just had her first…
Variance & Covariance Cheat Sheet Starting points (where every derivation begins) Everything below is derived…
Programming Note: I normally publish Munchies on Wednesday and the paid post on Thursday, but…
View Comments
true, strictly speaking, but only relevant when breakevens get very low. at current levels the floor options are so far out of the money they are nearly worthless, as demonstrated by the fact that seasoned tips with very far otm floors trade at the same yield as new issues. in addition, inflation swaps trade and have similar liquidity as tips but no floor. interestingly tips breakevens actually trade somewhat cheap to swaps despite the fact that they have a floor.